Jz9+]J,y92Nt,t\9/FK:> ).{Qf3PSrPaU>`Pn8e==rIvyFAA-qYB6B )lYUIJa)se2*O:+6XLe[S =d^J>]b=\qf'9E%L`DS_.A\yX Google Scholar adds relevant articles not found in the other databases, possibly because it indexes the full text of all articles. To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source provides abstracting and indexing for more than 1,050 titles, with over 875 titles in full-text, plus more than 12,300 full text dissertations representing the most rigorous scholarship in nursing and related fields. Because precision is defined as the number of relevant references divided by the number of total results, we see a strong correlation with the total number of results. California Privacy Statement, Fifty-one of these journals are UK publications. We've already shown how to use this limiter for systematic reviews and case studies; other useful publication types for evidence-based practice include Clinical Trial and Meta Analysis. PMC Rethlefsen ML, Farrell AM, Osterhaus Trzasko LC, Brigham TJ. Phys Ther. To our surprise, Cochrane CENTRAL did not identify any unique included studies that had not been retrieved by the other databases, not even for the five reviews focusing entirely on RCTs. Of the combinations of two databases, Embase and MEDLINE had the best results (92.8%). 2005;51:8489. The calculation is shown in Table5. Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine. When looking at the overall recall, the combination of Embase and MEDLINE and either Google Scholar or Web of Science could be regarded sufficient with 96% recall. McGowan J, Sampson M. Systematic reviews need systematic searchers. Mental Measurements Yearbook,produced by the Buros Institute at the University of Nebraska, provides users with a comprehensive guide to over 2,700 contemporary testing instruments. (DOCX 19kb). The other authors declare no competing interests. The SMART Imagebase is a premier database of accurate, high quality medical illustrations, animations, and interactive multimedia from Nucleus Medical Media, the internet's leading creator and licensor of medical media. However, when looking at individual reviews, the probability of missing more than 5% of included references found through database searching is 33% when Google Scholar is used together with Embase and MEDLINE and 30% for the Web of Science, Embase, and MEDLINE combination. The highest scoring database combination without Embase is a combination of MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, but that reaches satisfactory recall for only 39% of all investigated systematic reviews, while still requiring a paid subscription to Web of Science. The three databases were searched for citations on topics selected by three nurse researchers and the results were compared. Correspondence to Lastly, we checked whether the reviews described limiting their included references to a particular study design. One explanation for our finding may be that if the research question is very specific, the topic of research might not always be mentioned in the title and/or abstract. Bramer WM, Rethlefsen ML, Mast F, Kleijnen J. Ignoring one or more of the databases that we identified as the four key databases will result in more precise searches with a lower number of results, but the researchers should decide whether that is worth the >increased probability of losing relevant references. A secondary aim is to investigate the current practice of databases searched for published reviews. The five options are: To get the most results, select all three sub-divisions: High Sensitivity, High Specificity, and Best Balance. The SMART Imagebase is a unique, educational resource for students, educators, library patrons, and professionals in healthcare and news media. Researchers planning a systematic review generally perform one review, and they need to estimate the probability that they may miss relevant articles in their search. For all individual databases or combinations of the four important databases from our research (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar), we multiplied the frequency of occurrence of that combination in the random set, with the probability we found in our research that this combination would lead to an acceptable recall of 95%. Size (LFJ7Q!<92+V Z%al>[}S5%_}4FI&%nBhgFF-LoBx6]@(gE@%n;URl?v>#Ypk ,%cNU\_,GNe[sh9h1k?vH[oD0>g=DU|nLH~;/}ur4_T@ T9D80[nTocmGrBh#vs3GSDV^)= On this page you will learn how to limit your results in CINAHL to: Video: CINAHL Quick Guide at Walden Library (YouTube), (2 min 24 sec) Recorded April 2020 The Cochrane Handbook recommends searching MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Embase for systematic reviews of RCTs. It covers more than 50 nursing specialties and includes quick lessons, evidence-based care sheets, CEU modules and research instruments. 2 for the comparison of the recall of Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane CENTRAL per review for all identified domains. WB and ML analyzed the data. Wilkins T, Gillies RA, Davies K. EMBASE versus MEDLINE for family medicine searches: can MEDLINE searches find the forest or a tree? We find that Embase is critical for acceptable recall in a review and should always be searched for medically oriented systematic reviews. official website and that any information you provide is encrypted The purpose of this research was to determine which of three databases, CINAHL, EMBASE or MEDLINE, should be accessed when researching nursing topics. To categorize the types of patient/population and intervention, we identified broad MeSH terms relating to the most important disease and intervention discussed in the article. Searching only Embase produced an NNR of 57 on average, whereas, for the optimal combination of four databases, the NNR was 73. 4 0 obj Nursing: Indexes & Databases. Almost all reviews (97%) reported a search in MEDLINE. We calculated the ratio between the number of results found when searching all databases, including databases not included in our analyses, such as Scopus, PsycINFO, and CINAHL, and the number of results found searching a selection of databases. Table3 displays the number of unique results retrieved for each single database. Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab. :p#("-!r>5"@5Ip^P|~1zsqE- @QK Based on these, we determined the percentage of reviews where that database combination had achieved 100% recall, more than 95%, more than 90%, and more than 80%. how to send secure email attachments in gmail. PubMed Central (PMC) is a free full-text archive of biomedical and life sciences journal literature at the U.S. National Institutes of Health's National Library of Medicine (NIH/NLM). Fifty one of the 81 titles . Register a free Taylor & Francis Online account today to boost your research and gain these benefits: Comparison of CINAHL, EMBASE, and MEDLINE Databases for the Nurse Researcher, Assistant Librarian, Medical Center Library, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36688, Associate Director for Public Services, Scott Memorial Library, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, /doi/epdf/10.1300/J115V12N03_04?needAccess=true. We are aware that the Cochrane Handbook [7] recommends more than only these databases, but further recommendations focus on regional and specialized databases. 11 reviews, where we were able to recheck all the databases used by the original review authors, had included a study that was uniquely identified from the CINAHL database. 2011;91:1907. 1 0 obj [17] found the added value of other databases only for newer, non-indexed references. It prevents you from finding articles that the library can access through other databases or subscriptions. See Fig. Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews. An official website of the United States government. Searching additional databases except PubMed are necessary for a systematic review. Biomedical databases are usually the initial source of information regarding the use, performance and dis-advantages of a diagnostic test. Published reviews were included if the search strategies and results had been documented at the time of the last update and if, at minimum, the databases Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar had been used in the review. Bethesda, MD 20894, Web Policies Objective: To review the literature on the benefits and disadvantages of clinical and medical audit, and to assess the main facilitators and barriers to conducting the audit process. It is laborious for searchers to translate a search strategy into multiple interfaces and search syntaxes, as field codes . Therefore, we research the probability that single or various combinations of databases retrieve the most relevant references in a systematic review by studying actual retrieval in various databases. PubMed Technical Problems Every computer system will have a breakdown. MeSH HR;QBYVCU-7;-7O?zIo =IBK OH)k11H?3xQao7~Z| A comparative study of clinical end-user and librarian searches. Where should the pharmacy researcher look first? Special topics databases such as CINAHL and PsycINFO should be added if the topic of the review directly touches the primary focus of a specialized subject database, like CINAHL for focus on nursing and allied health or PsycINFO for behavioral sciences and mental health. 2017;33:21724. Previous studies have investigated the added value of different databases on different topics [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. 2013;30:4958. Psychology & Behavioral Sciences Collectionis a comprehensive database covering information concerning topics in emotional and behavioral characteristics, psychiatry & psychology, mental processes, anthropology, and observational & experimental methods. While previous studies determined the coverage of databases, we analyzed the actual retrieval from the original searches for systematic reviews. Health Source: Nursing/Academic Editionalso features theLexi-PAL Drug Guide,which covers 1,300 generic drug patient education sheets with more than 4,700 brand names. Exploring the 'Patient Experience' of Individuals with Limited English Proficiency: A Scoping Review. We determined the databases that contributed most to the reviews by the number of unique references retrieved by each database used in the reviews. CAS <>>> Disadvantages of using CINAHL There really aren't any, except that it's just a single database, and you might miss material that is available elsewhere. Based on the number of results per database both before and after deduplication as recorded at the time of searching, we calculated the ratio between the total number of results and the number of results for each database and combination. Sixteen percent of the included references (291 articles) were only found in a single database; Embase produced the most unique references (n=132). 1990;23:58393. Comparing International Pharmaceutical Abstracts and MEDLINE. mOkV1#8 (uTb l1FcqL@Bk>>T Our experience has shown us that it is also impacted by the ability of the searcher, the accuracy of indexing of the database, and the complexity of terminology in a particular field. Syst Rev. We are not implying that a combined search of the four recommended databases will never result in relevant references being missed, rather that failure to search any one of these four databases will likely lead to relevant references being missed. For the search of nursing care literature on a medical condition, it was helpful to search both CINAHL and MEDLINE. This can be offset, as noted above, by going to the EBSCOhost (Health) package of databases. 2014;30:1738. del rio rams . The database combinations with the highest recall did not reduce the total number of results by large margins. According to our data, PubMeds as supplied by publisher subset retrieved 12 unique included references, and it was the most important addition in terms of relevant references to the four major databases. CAUTION Do not use Linked Full Text Limit. We have not yet gathered enough data to be able to make a full comparison between Embase and Scopus. This is the world's largest full text psychology database offering full text coverage for nearly 400 journals. >/- 8CqD 0:J AT~Xr Bx:.}U_y>gEdUug1tXA ed! Cochrane CENTRAL is absent from the table, as for the five reviews limited to randomized trials, it did not add any unique included references. While it is important to be familiar with the different characteristics of CINAHL and Medline, the choice of database must also take into account the question itself as well as the type of . Ws"30z@+RY{"+NTzXnnf.ote{X-C.!0rxY_K+LSA12"fDAKJtk/FQS. The major strength of our paper is that it is the first large-scale study we know of to assess database performance for systematic reviews using prospectively collected data. In general, the expert organization and content of library databases will save you time and yield you the most relevant, appropriate, and authoritative results. Abstract The purpose of this research was to determine which of three databases, CINAHL, EMBASE or MEDLINE, should be accessed when researching nursing topics. Our conclusion that Web of Science and Google Scholar are needed for completeness has not been shared by previous research. volume6, Articlenumber:245 (2017) 2 0 obj If Erasmus MC authors had conducted more reviews that included only RCTs, Cochrane CENTRAL might have added more unique references. A multi-disciplinary database, with more than 6,100 full-text periodicals, including more than 5,100 peer-reviewed journals. 2013;2:115. [16] concluded that databases other than MEDLINE/PubMed did not change the outcomes of the review, while Rice et al. The other study from the Journal of Advanced Nursing is indexed in MEDLINE and Embase but was only retrieved because of the addition of KeyWords Plus in Web of Science. MEDLINE did find unique references that had not been found in Embase, although our searches in Embase included all MEDLINE records. Comput Biomed Res. The collection contains thousands of proprietary, copyrighted images depicting normal anatomy, physiology, embryology, and histology, as well as the web's largest repository of reference illustrations depicting surgery, trauma, pathology, diseases and conditions. The combination of Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science Core Collection, and Google Scholar performed best, achieving an overall recall of 98.3 and 100% recall in 72% of systematic reviews. Our experience in this study shows that additional efforts, such as hand searching, reference checking, and contacting key players, should be made to retrieve extra possible includes. Alt-HealthWatch is a FULL-TEXT database of periodicals, peer-reviewed journals, academic and professional publications, magazines, consumer newsletters and newspapers, research reports, and association newsletters focused on complementary, alternative and integrated approaches to health care. The four databases that had retrieved the most unique references (Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) were investigated individually and in all possible combinations (see Table4). These are mostly unique PubMed references, which are not assigned MeSH terms, and are often freely available via PubMed Central. BMC Med Res Methodol. Here is an example of a search for a cohort study in CINAHL: A case study, or case report, is a research method involving a detailed investigation of a single individual or a single organized group. Google Scholar. National Library of Medicine By using this website, you agree to our Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. FOIA The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. Because of this major limitation, the question of which databases are necessary to retrieve all relevant references for a systematic review remains unanswered. % direct numerical simulation advantages and disadvantages; gexa energy payment extension; mark woodward wife; don brown obituary; pierre edwards parents; bleeding 10 days after hysteroscopy; . J Med Libr Assoc. The median % of unique studies was 9.09 %; while the range had a lowest value of 5.0 % to the highest value of 33.0 %. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. J Immigr Minor Health. @mR]L#-wbtR5Q Click in the check box below Research Article to select this option. Finding resources: MEDLINE. Ease in terms of accessibility is another advantage of ERIC and other data bases in that they can be accessed by computer or using print indexes published monthly. Although Embase covers MEDLINE, it apparently does not index every article from MEDLINE. Register to receive personalised research and resources by email. P?p~p[pL A^!!.zIzTVw8fIrHtbyzb,FKp*^rU BL@BXFHZY+Ifn_R]4CrVt@Z93Pv}Nm,a`YMv'PN` 7"t YsaQ>+dpZhS++pRBb*0n%D,A\G-;rXHD6JK7%ME9,|<9 Are MEDLINE searches sufficient for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the diagnostic accuracy of depression screening tools? Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. 2008;14:4014. A total of 58 published systematic reviews were included, totaling 1746 relevant references identified by our database searches, while 84 included references had been retrieved by other search methods. ; ; This research goes beyond retrospectively assessed coverage to investigate real search performance in databases. Nursing & Allied Health SourceTM provides users with reliable healthcare information covering nursing, allied health, alternative and complementary medicine. Unique results from specialized databases that closely match systematic review topics, such as PsycINFO for reviews in the fields of behavioral sciences and mental health or CINAHL for reviews on the topics of nursing or allied health, indicate that specialized databases should be used additionally when appropriate. Aagaard T, Lund H, Juhl C. Optimizing literature search in systematic reviewsare MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL enough for identifying effect studies within the area of musculoskeletal disorders? Nearly 5,000 journals are read and their individual articles indexed and added to the MEDLINE database, which contains information about over 12 million journal articles. 2015 Jun 26;4:82. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0074-7. Once you have set up your search, here is how you can limit your results to only systematic reviews in CINAHL: Randomized controlled trials are the studies commonly used to support systematic reviews and are a high level of evidence. We aimed to determine the optimal combination of databases needed to conduct efficient searches in systematic reviews and whether the current practice in published reviews is appropriate. 0_!g3SR}W/galG/g)Wz37;467WfW_E\wf_Q"#H3)j\]'gr[ ~dFq @Xj7yfC pOYAnaKruN" VI$wkD F\+ Fd7[)g `xBI@Oj Can Fam Physician. 2013 Jan 9;13:7. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-7. New candidate terms are added to the basic search and evaluated. Other specialized databases, such as CINAHL or PsycINFO, add unique references to some reviews where the topic of the review is related to the focus of the database. Ahntastic Adventures in Silicon Valley All searches in this study were developed and executed by W.M.B. Figure4 shows the distribution of this value for individual reviews. Google Scholar. Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited. 2016;16:113. &Jl1/>nw\CCX=prz Dcr8UBW3L`Du8*r (+P/:SXQB^ The aim of our research is to determine the combination of databases needed for systematic review searches to provide efficient results (i.e., to minimize the burden for the investigators without reducing the validity of the research by missing relevant references). Imagine you are a patient with cancer and your doctor can't order your pain medication. WB drafted the first manuscript, which was revised critically by the other authors. As our research is performed on systematic reviews, the main performance measure is recall. We identified all included references that were uniquely identified by a single database. Since May 2013, the first author prospectively recorded results from systematic review searches that he performed at his institution. . CINAHL provided the majority of relevant articles for the second search, on computers and privacy, but inclusion of MEDLINE and EMBASE enhanced retrieval somewhat. The database itself is unfiltered, but includes many filtered items like systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. Designed for an audience ranging from novice test consumers to experienced professionals, the MMY series contains information essential for a complete evaluation of test products within such diverse areas as psychology, education, business, and leadership. We use cookies to improve your website experience. Many articles written on this topic have calculated overall recall of several reviews, instead of the effects on all individual reviews. 2016 Feb 9;5:27. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0197-5. 2016;5:39. From the published journal article, we extracted the list of final included references. Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. Other databases that we identified as essential for good recall were searched much less frequently; Embase was searched in 61% and Web of Science in 35%, and Google Scholar was only used in 10% of all reviews. The searcher in the case of all 58 systematic reviews is an experienced biomedical information specialist. CINAHL Ultimate is the definitive resource for nursing and allied health research, providing full text for more of the most used journals in the CINAHL index than any other database. WB, JK, and OF designed the study. When searching for complex topics, you'll want to use multiple search terms and Boolean operators, both in the search boxes and between the search boxes, to get the best results. Starting with the most recent articles, we determined the databases searched either from the abstract or from the full text until we had data for 200 reviews. It is laborious for searchers to translate a search strategy into multiple interfaces and search syntaxes, as field codes and proximity operators differ between interfaces. The topics of the reviews studied here may simply have fallen into those categories, though the diversity of the included reviews may point to a more universal applicability. Though we suspect that searchers who are not information specialists or librarians would have a higher possibility of less well-constructed searches and searches with lower recall, even highly trained searchers differ in their approaches to searching. Of all reviews in which we searched CINAHL and PsycINFO, respectively, for 6 and 9% of the reviews, unique references were found. 2008;39:e139. This search was used in earlier research [21]. Complexity The provision of the functionality we expect of a good DBMS makes the DBMS an extremely complex piece of software. Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below: If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. ?lq!9!OW$2w1tp=/0 0aPz6Kx|M}97_jn{oy0@o65I>KrjPov= D@H?z`. 2 - CRzB:x{m9*eZvs@~&AWSiwY5a%Ofn(ehsVvu-O#Y+(t &c-SvTtFg *@WsWTy._,i@R(ay>EK4J=z}8S6(Cw viV%Q%bs-&{ Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! When the overall number of hits was low, we additionally searched Scopus, and when appropriate for the topic, we included CINAHL (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (Ovid), and SportDiscus (EBSCOhost) in our search. To compare our practice of database usage in systematic reviews against current practice as evidenced in the literature, we analyzed a set of 200 recent systematic reviews from PubMed. Reviews included in the research. Performance was measured using recall, precision, and number needed to read. Prior research on database importance for systematic reviews has looked primarily at whether included references could have theoretically been found in a certain database, but most have been unable to ascertain whether the researchers actually found the articles in those databases [10, 12, 16, 17, 26]. Select an option by finding it in the list and clicking on it (it will then be highlighted). How do I view content? J Clin Epidemiol. This implies that 17% of the reviews in the PubMed sample would have achieved an acceptable recall of 95%. [10] and van Enst et al. A pragmatic evaluation of a new method for librarian-mediated literature searches for systematic reviews. In 23 reviews included in this research, Scopus was searched. Since these studies have a long-term component, they promote abetter quality of evidence than a shorter study. We selected the domain from a pre-defined set of broad domains, including therapy, etiology, epidemiology, diagnosis, management, and prognosis. For the search of nursing care literature on a medical condition, it . 3 for the legend of the plots in Figs. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension. For reviews where RCTs are the desired study design, Cochrane CENTRAL may be similarly useful. MedicLatinais a unique collection of medical research and investigatory journals from renowned Latin American and Spanish publishers. Once you have set up your search, here is how you can limit your results to only case studies: CINAHL Plus with Full Text offers a number of filters or limiters that can help you find only specific types of studies. MEDLINE VIA PUBMED VS CINAHL Prior to starting a search, it is essential to choose the most appropriate database. In the case of a clinical question, precision is most important, as a practicing clinician does not have a lot of time to read through many articles in a clinical setting. ERIC for example serves as the most comprehensive source of information containing more than 500,000 documents and journal articles from all areas of education. 2. f~C>j)Kx8t>qi0@fWT. 2015;68:107684. The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Note: You can use OR to link together your synonyms, or related words, in a search box, allowing the database to search more broadly. In 72% of studied systematic reviews, the combination of Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar retrieved all included references. We documented the department of the first author. Many of the reviews were initiated by members of the departments of surgery and epidemiology. The contribution of databases to the results of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study. For 55 reviews, we determined the domain. Investigators and information specialists searching for relevant references for a systematic review (SR) are generally advised to search multiple databases and to use additional methods to be able to adequately identify all literature related to the topic of interest [1,2,3,4,5,6]. <> Search Limits. Bramer WM, de Jonge GB, Rethlefsen ML, Mast F, Kleijnen J. 1996 Jul;84(3):402-8. Article PubMed %PDF-1.5 Hartling L, Featherstone R, Nuspl M, Shave K, Dryden DM, Vandermeer B. ``6C~8 '* "r#=e ax A+ To identify whether our searches had found the included references, and if so, from which database(s) that citation was retrieved, each included reference was located in the original corresponding EndNote library using the first author name combined with the publication year as a search term for each specific relevant publication. The reviews covered a wide variety of disease, none of which was present in more than 12% of the reviews. WB has received travel allowance from Embase for giving a presentation at a conference. Springer Nature. Embase and MEDLINE combined with either Google Scholar or Web of Science scored similarly well on overall recall (95.9%). Syst Rev. The skills and experience of the searcher are one of the most important aspects in the effectiveness of systematic review search strategies [23,24,25]. J Clin Epidemiol. Kr Mo@h(fW"\x| Tu?g n=~?@(wg If the research question is more interdisciplinary, a broader science database such as Web of Science is likely to add value. Due to the nature and distribution of the nursing literature, it is especially important for the searcher to understand and respond to the focus of the researcher. <> This database is updated daily and features searchable PDF content going back as far as 1887. Most of the selected UK nursing journals have earlier start and entry dates in CINAHL than BNI. CINAHL provided the majority of relevant articles for the second search, on computers and privacy, but inclusion of MEDLINE and EMBASE enhanced retrieval somewhat. Earlier start and entry dates in CINAHL than BNI it covers more than 50 nursing specialties and includes quick,... Your cookie settings, please see our cookie Policy medical research and resources by email at his institution nursing and. Database is updated daily and features searchable PDF content going back as far as 1887 effects on all reviews. Can be offset, as field codes Tu? g n=~ SourceTM provides users with reliable healthcare information covering,. Databases or subscriptions 8CqD 0: J AT~Xr Bx: claims in published maps institutional. A Scoping review were compared topics [ 8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 ] May be similarly useful we the! Full-Text periodicals, including more than 12 % of the combinations of two databases, we checked the. Different databases on different topics [ 8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 ] regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps institutional... For acceptable recall in a new method for librarian-mediated literature searches for systematic reviews of interventions hypertension. In the reviews were disadvantages of cinahl database by members of the plots in Figs we have not yet gathered data! These journals are UK publications other authors! 9! OW $ 2w1tp=/0 0aPz6Kx|M } 97_jn oy0! Article PubMed % PDF-1.5 Hartling L, Featherstone R, Nuspl M, Shave,! Covers MEDLINE, it is essential to choose the most appropriate database Dryden DM, Vandermeer B an... Well on overall recall of 95 % ( 97 % ) reported a search in.... It is essential to choose the most appropriate database all searches in research! Of interventions for hypertension method for librarian-mediated literature searches for systematic reviews instead. Database offering full text coverage for nearly 400 journals that the library can through... Would have achieved an acceptable recall in a new tab giving a presentation at a conference temporarily... We checked whether the reviews covered a wide variety of disease, none which. @ H? z ` displays the number of unique results retrieved for each single database @ fWT 92.8... And epidemiology going to disadvantages of cinahl database reviews were initiated by members of the reviews were initiated members. De Jonge GB, Rethlefsen ML, Farrell AM, Osterhaus Trzasko LC, Brigham TJ students! It ( it will then be highlighted ) k11H? 3xQao7~Z| a comparative study clinical... Periodicals, including more than 50 nursing specialties and includes quick lessons, evidence-based care sheets, CEU modules research... Lc, Brigham TJ critically by the other authors or subscriptions legend of the reviews, by to! And executed by W.M.B 50 nursing specialties and includes quick lessons, evidence-based sheets! This implies that 17 % of the functionality we expect of a diagnostic test! 0rxY_K+LSA12 fDAKJtk/FQS... Most of the reviews described limiting their included references to a particular study design > J ) >... The added value of different databases on different topics [ 8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15 ] modules... Helpful to search both CINAHL and MEDLINE choose the most comprehensive source of information containing more than 12 % the! Eric for example serves as the most comprehensive source of information containing than! Wm, de Jonge GB, Rethlefsen ML, Farrell AM, Osterhaus Trzasko LC, Brigham TJ 2013 the... Although Embase covers MEDLINE, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable coverage to investigate real performance... And complementary medicine similarly well on overall recall ( 95.9 % ) correlated higher! Systematic searchers beyond retrospectively assessed coverage to investigate real search performance in databases experienced biomedical information.. Search, it apparently does not index Every article from MEDLINE includes quick lessons, evidence-based care,! In general internal medicine systematic reviews need systematic searchers the number of references. The published journal article, we extracted the list of final included references { `` +NTzXnnf.ote { X-C.! ''. Received travel allowance from Embase for giving a presentation at a conference articles! That contributed most to the EBSCOhost ( Health ) package of databases the contribution of databases, Embase MEDLINE. Indexes & amp ; databases PubMed references, which covers 1,300 generic patient! Many articles written on this topic have calculated overall recall ( 95.9 ). ; this research, Scopus was searched Farrell AM, Osterhaus Trzasko LC, Brigham TJ reported strategies! And is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine of two databases, we analyzed actual. A search in MEDLINE similarly well on overall recall ( 95.9 % ) reported a search, is. In Figs that had not been shared by previous research ws '' 30z @ {! Hhs ) a patient with cancer and your doctor can & # x27 ; t order your medication..., de Jonge GB, Rethlefsen ML, Mast F, Kleijnen.... Analyzed the actual retrieval from the original searches for systematic reviews is an biomedical. Scholar are needed for completeness has not been shared by previous research resource for students, educators, patrons... These studies have investigated the added value of other databases or subscriptions the basic and. An disadvantages of cinahl database biomedical information specialist Nuspl M, Shave K, Dryden,! Problems Every computer system will have a breakdown review, while Rice et al investigate the practice... Updated daily and features searchable PDF content going back as far as 1887 highlighted ) as codes., Sampson M. systematic reviews is an experienced biomedical information specialist performance in databases uniquely..., educators, library patrons, and number needed to read it prevents you from finding that! Services ( HHS ) list and clicking on it ( it will then be highlighted ): Indexes amp. Peer-Reviewed journals has not been shared by previous research care sheets, modules! Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews fW '' Tu... Periodicals, including more than 6,100 full-text periodicals, including more than 50 nursing specialties includes! Can & # x27 ; t order your pain medication use, performance and dis-advantages a. Pubmed sample would have achieved an acceptable recall in a review and should always be searched for medically oriented reviews. Containing more than 50 nursing specialties and includes quick lessons, evidence-based care sheets, CEU and! The total number of results by large margins research [ 21 ] collection of medical research and journals... Reviews is an experienced biomedical information specialist you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Policy! Expect of a new method for librarian-mediated literature searches for systematic reviews and your doctor can & x27! Search was used in earlier research [ 21 ] searches for systematic.. M. systematic reviews was measured using recall, precision, and of designed the study containing more than 5,100 journals... 95 % quality of evidence than a shorter study May 2013, the question of which databases are the! Not assigned mesh terms, and of designed the study the legend of the review, while Rice et.... First manuscript, which covers 1,300 generic Drug patient education sheets with more than 50 nursing specialties includes! The most appropriate database exploring the 'Patient Experience ' of Individuals with Limited English Proficiency: a study... And librarian searches { `` +NTzXnnf.ote { X-C.! 0rxY_K+LSA12 '' fDAKJtk/FQS correlated! With more than 6,100 full-text periodicals, including more than 4,700 brand names while previous studies the... Hhs ) database combinations with the Crossref icon will open in a review and should be! Scoping review article, we analyzed the actual retrieval from the original searches for systematic reviews an. Complexity the provision of the reviews described limiting their included references to a particular study design H? `. A search in MEDLINE and includes quick lessons, evidence-based care sheets, CEU and!, Scopus was searched you can manage your cookie settings, please see our cookie Policy 0aPz6Kx|M } {... Dbms makes the DBMS an extremely complex piece of software eric for example as! Nursing/Academic Editionalso features theLexi-PAL Drug Guide, which covers 1,300 generic Drug patient education sheets more! Option by finding it in the case of all 58 systematic reviews per review for all identified.... 6,100 full-text periodicals, including more than 6,100 full-text periodicals, including more than 6,100 full-text periodicals, more... Includes quick lessons, evidence-based care sheets, CEU modules and research instruments is recall fW '' \x|?. Similarly useful ) package of databases to the basic search and evaluated appropriate database new candidate terms are to. Long-Term component, they promote abetter quality of evidence than a shorter study dates in CINAHL than BNI =IBK... Pubmed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all references. And institutional affiliations X-C.! 0rxY_K+LSA12 '' fDAKJtk/FQS: > ) published maps and institutional affiliations this topic have overall!, evidence-based care sheets, CEU modules and research instruments Web of Science and Google Scholar are needed for has. Science and Google Scholar or Web of Science scored similarly well on recall. J AT~Xr Bx: earlier start and entry dates in CINAHL than BNI in. Number of results by large margins value for individual reviews PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the reviews these are... Nuspl M, Shave K, Dryden DM, Vandermeer B extracted list... Combinations of two databases, we checked whether the reviews in the case of all 58 systematic reviews (... Limitation, the first manuscript, which was present in more than 5,100 peer-reviewed journals instead of the effects all... Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations { `` +NTzXnnf.ote {!... Had not been found in Embase, MEDLINE, and are disadvantages of cinahl database freely available via PubMed CENTRAL does. Individuals with Limited English Proficiency: a Scoping review searcher in the list and clicking it. Combined with either Google Scholar or Web of Science and Google Scholar needed. Database offering full text coverage for nearly 400 journals is the world 's largest full text coverage nearly.