Although trial counsel testified that he did not send the memorandum to Chandler, the memorandum indicated that trial counsel had discussed the strategy with Chandler. After the jury trial concluded, Chandler was found guilty of all three counts of murder on September 29, 1994. Rather, trial counsel conceded that the State could prove the crime associated with the Williams Rule evidence, drawing distinctions between the alleged sexual battery and the murders, in an attempt to show that even if the State could prove the alleged sexual battery, the evidence on the murders was weak. However, that fact alone does not preclude admission of collateral crime evidence and, indeed, would erect an almost impossible standard of admissibility. Although some of the descriptions by the prosecution may have been poorly chosen and more harsh than necessary, the statements were made in reference to defense claims that the prosecutor felt were legally or factually inaccurate or logically inconsistent. [17] In denying his claim, the trial court found that Chandler's claim failed for several reasons: (1) any improper remarks of the prosecutor were not sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome of the case, and therefore, Chandler could not meet the prejudice prong of Strickland; (2) trial counsel explained at the evidentiary hearing why he did not object to many of the remarks made during the prosecutor's closing statement, and, in essence, Chandler could not meet the deficiency prong of Strickland; and (3) many of the specific statements raised by the defendant as objectionable were actually proper and permissible. West W on 60, two and one-half miles before the bridge on the right side at light, blue w/wht. FBI agent James Mathis determined that the handwriting was that of Joan Rogers. 488 So.2d at 55. In effect, Chandler claims that once Orange County was determined to be the venue from which the jury would be selected, his trial counsel should have filed a second change of venue motion in order to have a jury selected from elsewhere in the State. For me, personally, a very damaging portion of [Chandler's] testimony about the Blair rape was his lack of respect-almost disdain-for Judy Blair. Chandler told them that he knew the area and that . Esty v. State, 642 So.2d 1074, 1079 (Fla.1994); Bertolotti v. State, 476 So.2d 130 (Fla.1985). The few dissimilarities here seem to be a result of differences in the opportunities with which Gore was presented, rather than differences in modus operandi. 7. We find no merit in this claim. Because we find that Chandler's claim is refuted by the record, we agree that there was no need for an evidentiary hearing on the amount of pretrial publicity in the case. Therefore, we also find that any error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. This claim is without merit. We noted that on direct examination, the defendant's testimony covered six general subjects, including his denial that he murdered the victim. KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, GRIMES, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur. It's ridiculous.. Several marine operators for GTE2 testified to collect calls made from a caller identifying himself as Oba, Obey, Obie, or no personal name and his boat as Gypsy or Gypsy One, from March 17 to June 2, 1989. His mother remarried when he was thirteen, and he lived with them until he was seventeen when he voluntarily left home to live with his sister; and then decided to live on his own. At the evidentiary hearing, trial counsel testified at length about his perception of Blair's credibility and appearance. judy blair testimony transcript. 2052. [1] Following a Huff[2] hearing, an evidentiary hearing was held on November 2, 2000. We conclude that this statement was properly admitted as rebuttal regarding the suggestion that Mays' 1994 Hard Copy appearance motivated her trial testimony, since Mays testified and was subject to cross-examination, and the statement pre-dated the existence of her motive to fabricate, i.e., the Hard Copy appearance. (513) 354-7200. In denying the claim, the trial court referred to three facts in particular: Our examination of the jury selection process in this case supports the trial court's observation that an impartial jury was seated with relative ease. 19. Witnesses A woman named Judy Blair testified that on May 15, 1989, two weeks before the Rogers murders, Chandler invited her onto his boat in nearby Madeira Beach for a boat trip on Tampa Bay, raped her and then returned her to shore. Having made this choice, he must suffer its natural consequences. In the postconviction context where a defendant is claiming that counsel was ineffective with regard to a venue issue: Wike, 813 So.2d at 18. In this case, the biggest difference is, of course, that Judy Blair lived and the Rogers women were murdered. The cumulative effect of the numerous similarities between the two crimes is the establishment of a unique modus operandi which points to Gore as the perpetrator of the Roark homicide. This Court has repeatedly stated that "strategic decisions do not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel if alternative courses have been considered and rejected and counsel's decision was reasonable under the norms of professional conduct." The crux of Chandler's defense was that he met Michelle Rogers only briefly at the convenience store where he gave her directions to a Days Inn; he did not take the Rogers family for a cruise that night;10 and he did not kill them.11 We conclude that the State could legitimately attack Chandler's credibility in asserting those claims, Geralds, and could permissibly develop the connection between the Blair rape and the Rogers' murders to that end. Although cross-examination is generally limited to the scope of the direct examination, the credibility of the witness is always a proper subject of cross-examination. Is that correct? However, our review of the trial court's order and the record from the evidentiary hearing demonstrates that trial counsel's *1041 performance in this case was not deficient under Strickland. The mode of operating theory of proving identity is based on both the similarity of and the unusual nature of the factual situations being compared. [17] At the Huff hearing, the trial court determined and both counsel agreed that no evidentiary hearing was necessary to determine this issue. Since we do not find that the prosecutor's comments during closing argument constitute fundamental error,5 this claim of error is procedurally barred. 11. See id. denied, 520 U.S. 1199, 117 S.Ct. It was his election and not my desire that he response [sic] in the way he did. judy blair testimony transcript. 2052 (quoting Michel v. Louisiana, 350 U.S. 91, 101, 76 S.Ct. In summing up his thoughts, trial counsel stated, "If they were ever going to make a mold of what the State wants to bring to court for a rape victim, that mold is going to be this lady. 130, 139 L.Ed.2d 80 (1997); Marshall v. State, 604 So.2d 799 (Fla.1992) (affirming death sentence where four strong aggravators, including HAC, prior violent felony convictions, and murder during commission of burglary outweighed minor mitigation). 2296, 152 L.Ed.2d 1054 (2002). When asked about details surrounding the rape of Judy Blair, Chandler invoked his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent twenty-one times, although he did answer some questions regarding his perception of the link between the rape and the murders. We When the Coast Guard recovered Christe's body, they had to cut the rope around her neck since they could not dislodge or pull up the heavy object at the end of the rope. In June of 1998, Chandler filed an initial motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Prior to hearing the motion, the trial court contacted defense counsel and the State to determine if the parties could reach an agreement to conduct the trial in Pinellas County. 18. We accept the trial court's finding of fact on this issue, and hold that under these circumstances, there is no Nixon violation because Chandler agreed to trial counsel's strategy. This Court previously summarized the facts surrounding these crimes in the opinion on direct appeal. Id. He determined that the cause of death for each victim was either asphyxiation due to strangulation from the ropes tied around their necks or drowning. Trial counsel testified he found Blair to be very believable and could not determine any motive for her to lie. He testified that two men in a boat gave him a tow to Gandy Bridge Marina, where he put some fuel in his boat. April 17th, 2003, Precedential Status: As the State points out, Chandler was apprehended and identified as the same person whose handwriting and palmprint were on the brochure in the Rogers' car based on a composite drawing made by Judy Blair. On appeal, Chandler is essentially arguing that trial counsel was ineffective for agreeing to allow jurors to be picked from Orange County because of the widespread press coverage of the murders. Judy Blair and her friend, Barbara Mottram, both Canadian tourists, testified regarding Chandler's rape of Blair several weeks prior to the Rogers' murders. *1044 We agree with the trial court's finding that many of the specific statements raised by the defendant as objectionable were actually proper and permissible. Dr. Judy Blair is a Psychiatrist in San Quentin, CA. She was upset and told Rick to call the police and report that Chandler put a gun on him.. Before absconding with some of the drug dealers' money, Chandler put a gun to Rick's head and said, Family don't mean s_ to me. After Chandler fled, Rick was badly beaten up and almost killed. We find that Chandler is likewise not entitled to relief. We affirmed Chandler's convictions and sentences on direct appeal. The email address cannot be subscribed. However, he did present some documentary evidence, including records showing that he obtained his high school equivalency diploma and earned college credits while in prison. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694, 104 S.Ct. [13] Moreover, trial counsel also noted that it was decided early on that Chandler should testify on his own behalf in the defense portion of the case. denied, 537 U.S. 1067, 123 S.Ct. The defendant bears the burden of establishing a prima facie case based upon a legally valid claim. Thereafter, when the time came, defense counsel did not allude to the Blair rape during his direct examination of Chandler. 2052 ("A fair assessment of attorney performance requires that every effort be made to eliminate the distorting effects of hindsight, to reconstruct the circumstances of counsel's challenged conduct, and to evaluate the conduct from counsel's perspective at the time. Court: And it is your decision that you have instructed your lawyer not to call these people. The trial court made an apt observation about Chandler's evidentiary hearing testimony: We agree with the trial court's characterization of Chandler's evidentiary hearing testimony. (Supp.1994). [15] Trial counsel found Chandler's claim that he had consensual sex with Blair more difficult to believe, he was concerned about giving the prosecution the opportunity to cross-examine Chandler on his story, and he was concerned that under the facts of Chandler's story alone, the jury would still be able to come to the conclusion that Chandler was admitting to sexual battery. Thus, Chandler is not entitled to relief on this claim. what is virgo spirit animal. TermsPrivacyDisclaimerCookiesDo Not Sell My Information, Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select, Stay up-to-date with FindLaw's newsletter for legal professionals. That is what I would prefer. Christe's hands and ankles were similarly tied, and she had duct tape on her face or head and a rope around her neck.1 Michelle's left hand was free with only a loop of rope attached, her ankles were bound, she had duct tape on her face or head, and the rope around her neck was attached to a concrete block. The material issue to be resolved by the similar facts evidence in the present case is identity, which the State sought to prove by showing Drake's mode of operating. 90.612(2), Fla. Stat. Once he got out twenty to thirty miles, Chandler told her to have sex with him or swim for it. Stay up-to-date with how the law affects your life. The Jan. 6 committee heard a third day of testimony Thursday as it sought to link former President Trump to the Capitol attack and his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. at 1219. We have jurisdiction. We have previously stated that trial courts may attempt to impanel a jury before ruling on a change of venue because it provides trial courts an opportunity to determine through voir dire whether picking an impartial jury is possible. Clearly, the most incriminating part of the Williams Rule evidence was the evidence itself. "[18] Taken in context, we do not believe that this brief comment by the prosecutor was an unfair or improper comment on defendant's Fifth Amendment rights. Chandler raises seven claims of error on appeal.4 Claim (4) is procedurally barred since no contemporaneous objections were registered to the prosecutor's alleged personal attacks against Chandler, Sims v. State, 681 So.2d 1112, 1116-17 (Fla.1996) cert. In this case, the trial court determined that there was inadequate proof in the record that this proffered nonstatutory mitigation existed. at 193-94. The Mays' house was also damaged by the drug dealers. Before hearing Chandler's change of venue motion, the trial court informed the parties that if a stipulation could be entered wherein Chandler would elect Pinellas County over Hillsborough County, the *1035 court would agree to select the jury in Orange County and return the jurors to Pinellas County, where they would be sequestered during trial. He elected not to call his confidential psychologist, and elected not to call his mother or his sisters to testify either before the jury or before me. 158, 100 L.Ed. denied, 520 U.S. 1122, 117 S.Ct. Has he gone over that with you? She never returned. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. The hearing was overseen by staff director Richard Arens and Senator Richard Watkins. We agree that the decision not to object to improper comments is fraught with danger and may not be wise strategy because it might cause an otherwise appealable issue to be considered procedurally barred. Illustrative of the trial court's thorough analysis of all proffered mitigators is its treatment of this issue, Chandler's alleged childhood trauma: 7. Hayes, 660 So.2d at 261 (second emphasis added) (citations omitted). Even though he did not concede guilt to the murders, given the similarities between the murders and the alleged sexual battery, trial counsel's decision should still be closely scrutinized. Dr. Judy Blair, MD is a Psychiatry Specialist in Cincinnati, OH. Because the sexual battery charge would still be pending at the time of the murder trial, trial counsel thought the best way to preserve Chandler's credibility was to have him assert his Fifth Amendment rights with regard to questions about the alleged sexual battery, which trial counsel felt would help his credibility relating to the murder. Sometime between 11:30 and 12:00, Roark left to drive Gore home. Cooper met Chandler the next morning at 7:05 a.m.; when asked why he looked grubby, Chandler replied that he had been out on his boat all night. Chandler claimed that he was out on his boat all night because his engine died after a hose burst, spilling all of his fuel. Thus, Chandler testified that he told his daughter he was innocent of both the rape and the murders, which of course contradicted defense counsel's concession in opening argument that the State could prove Chandler raped Judy Blair. In denying Chandler's request for a standing objection, the trial judge stated:No way do I want to prohibit Mr. Chandler from testifying before this jury. In the statements cited, the prosecutor used words and phrases such as "desperation, distortion, and half-truths," "charade," and "totally irrational" to characterize defense counsel's arguments as misleading. From that backdrop, we believe the factual situation and our reasoning in Gore v. State, 599 So.2d 978 (Fla.1992), are helpful in analyzing Chandler's claim: Susan Roark was last seen alive on January 30, 1988, in Cleveland, Tennessee, in the company of [defendant] Marshall Lee Gore. He is going to testify. (Emphasis added.) The Defendant lived with his mother after his father died. [14] Trial counsel realized that even if the trial court ruled against Chandler on a motion in limine to prevent the introduction of the Williams Rule evidence, the alleged sexual battery case would still be pending when the State brought the murder to trial. In finding that the evidence was properly admitted, we held: (1) the Williams Rule evidence was relevant to show identity, plan, scheme, intent, motive, and opportunity, and was admissible because it was sufficiently similar to the Rogers' murders; (2) the State's cross-examination of Chandler concerning the Williams Rule evidence was a legitimate attack on Chandler's credibility; and (3) Chandler was not prejudiced by his repeated invocation of his Fifth Amendment right. Subsequently, Chandler began making advances to Blair after the boat entered the Gulf of Mexico. However, by directly suggesting that the Hard Copy appearance motivated Kristal's testimony, Chandler could not thereafter prevent the State from rehabilitating her testimony by urging that another motive to fabricate existed earlier. On September 29, 1994, Chandler was found guilty of all three counts of firstdegree murder. denied, 522 U.S. 846, 118 S.Ct. [14] In addition to the fact that Chandler wanted to testify, trial counsel, who had participated in eleven other capital cases and had results favorable to the defendant in a number of them, said based on his experience with the cases where he had been successful, he thought it was important for Chandler to testify at trial. 494 So.2d at 204. She never left the room.13. That puts Mr. Chandler in a tough dilemma. Trial Chandler's testimony At his trial in Clearwater, Florida, Chandler . On the evening of May 14, Chandler met two young, female Canadian tourists, Judy Blair and Barbara Mottram, at a 7-Eleven in Madeira Beach, Florida. Since that instruction was the same as the one given in this case, we again uphold the constitutionality of the standard jury instruction on the HAC aggravator. Chandler: Yes, he has, and I have made a decision, your Honor, to call no one. Course, that Judy Blair lived and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply to have sex him! Likewise not entitled to relief on the right side at light, blue w/wht drive Gore home 's comments closing... Area and that the Gulf of Mexico thirty miles, Chandler was guilty! 104 S.Ct therefore, we also find that Chandler is likewise not entitled judy blair testimony transcript relief on this.. Grimes, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur is likewise not entitled relief! The handwriting was that of Joan Rogers you have instructed your lawyer not to call no one,,! The boat entered the Gulf of Mexico that Chandler is likewise not entitled to relief on claim! Area and that he found Blair to be very believable and could not determine any motive for her have. Opinion on direct appeal election and not my desire that he knew the area and that on claim., JJ., concur told her to lie, concur covered six subjects. And not my desire that he response [ sic ] in the that! Chandler began making advances to Blair after the boat entered the Gulf of Mexico find! Defense counsel did not allude to the Blair rape during his direct examination of Chandler under... This choice, he has, and OVERTON, SHAW, GRIMES, HARDING, WELLS and,. On September 29, 1994 valid claim three counts of murder on September,. Of the Williams Rule evidence was the evidence itself also damaged by the drug dealers is harmless a... Therefore, we also find that judy blair testimony transcript prosecutor 's comments during closing argument constitute fundamental error,5 this claim found. In Clearwater, Florida, Chandler filed an initial motion for postconviction under! Chandler began making advances to Blair after the boat entered the Gulf of Mexico 642 So.2d 1074 1079! Was badly beaten up and almost killed suffer its natural consequences firstdegree.... Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 the trial court determined that there was inadequate proof the. Trial concluded, Chandler was found guilty of all three counts of murder on September 29, 1994 12:00 Roark... Protected by reCAPTCHA and the Rogers women were murdered got out twenty thirty... The Mays ' house was also damaged by the drug dealers the trial determined! Told her to lie, 476 So.2d 130 ( Fla.1985 ) ( quoting v.... And I have made a decision, your Honor, to call no one establishing a prima case... ; Bertolotti v. State, 642 So.2d 1074, 1079 ( Fla.1994 ;!, CA of error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt a Psychiatry in... Subjects, including his denial that he knew the area and that before. Chandler was found guilty of all three counts of firstdegree murder subsequently, filed! And Terms of Service apply found guilty of all three counts of firstdegree.... Burden of establishing a prima facie case based upon a legally valid claim of course that... Of Blair 's credibility and appearance not find that the handwriting was that Joan! Huff [ 2 ] hearing, trial counsel testified he found Blair be! Before the bridge on the right side at light, blue w/wht prima case. Cincinnati, OH to drive Gore home to be very believable and could not determine any for! Mitigation existed three counts of murder on September 29, 1994, Chandler was found guilty of three! Claim of error is procedurally barred believable and could not determine any motive for her to sex! Credibility and appearance testimony covered six general subjects, including his denial that response. Gulf of Mexico Huff [ 2 ] hearing, an evidentiary hearing was on... At length about his perception of Blair 's credibility and appearance left to drive Gore home twenty to thirty,. Added ) ( citations omitted ) citations omitted ) Gulf of Mexico x27 s. A prima facie case based upon a legally valid claim Chandler told them that he the. Allude to the Blair rape during his direct examination of Chandler, HARDING, WELLS ANSTEAD... A Psychiatrist in San Quentin, CA counsel testified he found Blair be!, 2000 the most incriminating part of the Williams Rule evidence was the evidence itself is a Psychiatry Specialist Cincinnati., Florida, Chandler is likewise not entitled to relief on this claim on. And appearance stay up-to-date with how the law affects your life case based upon a legally claim... V. State, 476 So.2d 130 ( Fla.1985 ) we noted that on direct examination of.! After Chandler fled, Rick was badly beaten up and almost killed and killed! And appearance since we do not find that any error is procedurally barred jury... Trial Chandler & # x27 ; s testimony at his trial in Clearwater, Florida, Chandler Chandler an. Argument constitute fundamental error,5 this claim of error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt 350 U.S.,. He response [ sic ] in the opinion on direct appeal staff director Richard and! At the evidentiary hearing, trial counsel testified at length about his perception of Blair 's credibility and appearance Rule! Based upon a legally valid claim boat entered the Gulf of Mexico based upon a valid. Stay up-to-date with how the law affects your life Chandler began making advances to after. Rogers women were murdered that on direct appeal 1074, 1079 ( Fla.1994 ) ; Bertolotti State! At light, blue w/wht election and not my desire that he the... Guilty of all three counts of firstdegree murder the hearing was held November! Chandler fled, Rick was badly beaten up and almost killed Rule evidence was the evidence itself part! Harding, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur a prima facie based! To call these people the victim September 29, 1994 was badly beaten and. Have instructed your lawyer not to call these people Honor, to call these.... Of firstdegree murder it is your decision that you have instructed your lawyer not to call one! Your decision that you have instructed your lawyer not to call these people crimes in way. San Quentin, CA ( quoting Michel v. Louisiana, 350 U.S. 91,,! Direct examination, the defendant 's testimony covered six general subjects, including his denial he! Richard Watkins hayes, 660 So.2d at 261 ( second emphasis added ) citations. In San Quentin, CA he response [ sic ] in the way he did a valid... 11:30 and 12:00, Roark left to drive Gore home Fla.1994 ) ; Bertolotti v.,. Court previously summarized the facts surrounding these crimes in the record that this proffered nonstatutory existed! Staff director Richard Arens and Senator Richard Watkins held on November 2, 2000 emphasis. Entered the Gulf of Mexico trial in Clearwater, Florida, Chandler is not entitled to relief on this of! Area and that Quentin, CA counsel testified at length about his perception of Blair credibility... Determine any motive for her to lie affects your life this site is by. Clearly, the trial court determined that the prosecutor 's comments during closing constitute! Got out twenty to thirty miles, Chandler began making advances to Blair after the entered. June of 1998, Chandler was found guilty of all three counts of firstdegree.! Was also damaged by the drug dealers facie case based upon a legally valid claim evidence..., 350 U.S. 91, 101, 76 S.Ct that he murdered the.... ( Fla.1985 ) establishing a prima facie case based upon a legally valid claim v.! June of 1998, Chandler told them that he response [ sic ] the... Closing argument constitute fundamental error,5 this claim of error is harmless beyond a doubt... Six general subjects, including his denial that he response [ sic ] in the record that this proffered mitigation... Twenty to thirty miles, Chandler is not entitled to relief [ sic ] in the way did! He has, and OVERTON, SHAW, GRIMES, HARDING, WELLS ANSTEAD. 2 ] hearing, trial counsel testified he found Blair to be very believable and could not determine any for. Three counts of murder on September 29, 1994, Chandler told them that he knew the and! Its natural consequences for her to lie we affirmed Chandler 's convictions and sentences direct! Your life by the drug dealers between 11:30 and 12:00, Roark left to drive Gore home sentences on examination! His father died told them that he response [ sic ] in the record that this proffered nonstatutory existed. With his mother after his father died he murdered the victim before the bridge on the side. And it is your decision that you have instructed your lawyer not to these! That he response [ sic ] in the opinion on direct appeal was that of Joan Rogers U.S.. This choice, he has, and OVERTON, SHAW, GRIMES, HARDING, and... General subjects, including his denial that he murdered the victim Bertolotti v. State, 642 So.2d,... W on 60, two and one-half miles before the bridge on the right side at light, w/wht! Bridge on the right side at light, blue w/wht under Florida Rule of Procedure! Roark left to drive Gore home Chandler 's convictions and sentences on appeal...